Cases 41 - 50 of 619
Spencer Nimham El Dey v. DOC et al
as 1:2022cv04028
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Spencer Nimham El Dey
Defendant:
DOC, DOC Commissioner, CO Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00999
Plaintiff:
Jason Darnell Gregory
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Marshals Service, John Z Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williamson v. Boyle
as 3:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Clarence R. Williamson, III and Mark Howard
Defendant:
Lieutenant Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Edge
as 22-10302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Jamal White
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Edge, John Boyle, Kevin Strength and others
DAWSON v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAWSON
Defendant:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, DONALD HICKS, RAYNARD T. FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYLE v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv01331
Petitioner:
RICHARD BOYLE
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Michael Boyles v. Troy Bowser
as 22-35313
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE BOYLES
Respondent / Appellee:
TROY BOWSER, Warden
Smith v. Boyle
as 5:2022ct03090
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILDS v. FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
DONTAY WILDS
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL, RON FREEMAN, CORRECT CARE SOLITIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El v. City of Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
Bakha Yawuti El
Defendant:
City of Myrtle Beach, City of Myrtle Beach Police Department, David Giosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
