Cases 41 - 50 of 530
Connell v. Perez et al
as 1:2022cv21219
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Connell
Defendant:
Perez, Florez and Bruno Gonzalas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BRUNO v. ADMINISTRATOR et al
as 2:2022cv01470
Petitioner:
FREDERICO BRUNO
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zuniga-Bruno v. US
as 22-1159
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN J. ZUNIGA-BRUNO
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
BRUNO v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2022cv01621
Plaintiff:
LAMAR BRUNO, JR
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION and ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL HEALTHCARE PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraway v. Chicago Heights P.D. et al
as 1:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
Michael D Caraway
Defendant:
Chicago Heights P.D., Alfredo Salinas, Anthony Bruno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pledger v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Pledger
Defendant:
David Shinn, Damon Hininger, Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colonna v. CoreCivic of Tennessee LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Michael Colonna
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee LLC, CoreCivic Incorporated, Bruno Stolc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEJERINETT v. WHITE et al
as 3:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEJERINETT
Defendant:
J WHITE, M LOWE, C PUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. McCoy et al
as 3:2021cv00969
Plaintiff:
Daniel C W Harrison
Defendant:
Tim McCoy, Bruno Martinsky, Corey Calvert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruno v. Annucci et al
as 9:2021cv01337
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bruno
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Myers and Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
