Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,406
Reynolds v. Day
as 24-30020
Petitioner: Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Respondent: Orleans Parish Magistrate Court and Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Reynolds v. Day
as 24-30021
Petitioner: Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Respondent: David B. LeBlanc, Assistant District Attorney and Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Reynolds v. Rayburn Correctional Center
as 24-30013
Plaintiff: Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Defendant: Rayburn Correctional Center, Travis Day and Karla Wheat
Day v. Swain County Detention Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff: Paul Gordon Day
Defendant: Swain County Detention Center, Leanna Arch, Bryson City, NC Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Day et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff: Abe Lindsey
Defendant: Travis Day and Major Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Willis et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: Dai-Juan Taikain Taylor
Defendant: Fannie Willis, Police Chief of Fairburn, GA, Fairburn Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrams v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff: Timothy Abrams
Defendant: James M LeBlanc, Travis W Day, Rayburn Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day-Skains v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00034
Plaintiff: Crystal Day-Skains
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DAY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00014
Petitioner: WILLIAM QUINN DAY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Tamar Harvey v. Laura Maughan
as 23-7281
Plaintiff: TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY
Defendant: SANDRA DAY CONNOR, Grievance Head and LAURA ELIZABETH MAUGHAN, Attorney

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?