Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Bownes v. Grondolsky
as 10-1796
Petitioner - Appellant: MARVIS H. BOWNES
Respondent - Appellee: JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Brown v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv02435
Plaintiff: Jeremy Brown
Defendant: Harley Lappin, Delbert Sauers, R E Holt and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bownes v. Grondolsky
as 1:2009cv11673
Petitioner: Marvis H. Bownes
Respondent: Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Terrell v. Reese et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01613
Plaintiff: Brooks Terrell
Defendant: Constance Reese, B Clay, Elston and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kareem Millhouse v. R. Arbasak, et al
as 09-2858
Plaintiff - Appellant: KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee: R. ARBASAK, D. DEMPSEY, Lieutenant, JAMES GIBBS, S.I.S. LIEUTENANT and others
Kareem Millhouse v. R. Arbasak, et al
as 09-2709
Plaintiff - Appellant: KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee: R. ARBASAK, D. DEMPSEY, Lieutenant, JAMES GIBBS, S.I.S. LIEUTENANT and others
Johnston v. Central Medical Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00058
Plaintiff: Keith Eric Johnston
Defendant: Central Medical Services, Unknown Cabrera, Unknown Bowne and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bownes v. Epps
as 08-60596
Petitioner - Appellant: ULYSSES BOWNES
Respondent - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Bownes v. Epps
as 08-60080
Petitioner - Appellant: ULYSSES BOWNES
Respondent - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Marvis Bownes v. USA
as 08-1026
Petitioner - Appellant: MARVIS H. BOWNES
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?