Cases 41 - 50 of 215
Baker et al v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baker, Robert Andrews, Timothy Cone and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mace v. Prumell et al
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Mace
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Prumell, Jennifer Jordan, Poulton Tamantha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker et al v. Collier et al. DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 4:2022cv03820
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baker, Robert Andrews, Timothy Cone and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Burnham v. Hooper et al
as 2:2022cv02857
Plaintiff:
Richard Burnham
Defendant:
Tim Hooper, Department of Public Correction and Safety, Robert E. Burrow Treatment Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrows v. USA
as 0:2022cv00055
Petitioner:
Frederick L. Burrows
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06174
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Littleton v. Montiez et al
as 2:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Michael Littleton
Defendant:
Mark Montiez, Melody Sanders, Anna Treystov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
