Cases 41 - 50 of 246
(PC) Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, L Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Franson et al
as 1:2021cv00057
Defendant:
Johnson, Ryder May, Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ager v. Hooks et al
as 5:2020ct03382
Defendant:
Ms. Bullard, Tracy W. Dailey, Michelle Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Leon M. Ager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANUEL v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2020cv01759
Defendant:
ASST SUPERINTENDENT ERIC ARMEL, C/O SERGENT WILES, C/O LT. DAILEY and others
Plaintiff:
KARL B. MANUEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kidd v. Stewart et al
as 1:2020cv00544
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Lt. Dailey and Cynthia Stewart
Plaintiff:
William Darnell Kidd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2020cv06483
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, R C Younger and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Cook et al
as 1:2020cv00445
Defendant:
Tamarowia Dailey, James Smith and Mary Cook
Plaintiff:
Roderick Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jointer v. Jackson County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2020cv00259
Defendant:
Burt Unknown, Juvaris Dailey, C. Bordelon and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Perry Megail Jointer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manuel v. Dailey
as 1:2020cv00372
Defendant:
Jeff Dunn, Lynn Head, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
De'Angelo Manuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dailey v. Galloway, et al
as 8:2020cv01731
Defendant:
Robert G. Fegers, Captain Galloway, Deputy Jameson and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
