Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Bates et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2014cv02085
Plaintiff:
Eric Bates , Paul Blevins , Michael Blue and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard, Paul Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2014cv00706
Petitioner:
Clarence Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Brown, et al.
as 1:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
Kazi Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Brown, Dunlap, Armendariz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Brown et al
as 3:2014cv00281
Plaintiff:
Karl Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Brown, Dunlap, Armendariz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Virga
as 5:2013cv05626
Petitioner:
Daniel Jones
Respondent:
T. V. Virga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v McCall
as 6:2013cv00749
Petitioner:
James Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2012cv02066
Plaintiff:
Ernest L Walker
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Maricopa, County of, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2012cv00472
Defendant:
Michael Barnett, Terry Craeter, Cade Crippen and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Jadar Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza et al v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2012cv01904
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Garza, Wilton Bethany, Merrill Parker and others
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, Brad Livingston, Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 4:2012cv01905
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Coleman
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division, Brad Livingston, Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
