Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Taalak v. Pavalis et al
as 3:2019cv03002
Defendant:
Dr. Pavalis, Darren Berg, Clayton Stoche and others
Plaintiff:
Eve Taalak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snorsky v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv03025
Defendant:
S. Sturgeon, R. Neff, Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
John Standley Snorsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mazzarella v. USA
as 2:2018cv01887
Petitioner:
Eve Mazzarella
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Espinoza v. Ramisch et al
as 1:2018cv01204
Plaintiff:
Michael Shannon Espinoza
Defendant:
Robert Dick, Roland Jackson, Jackie McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVES v. WARDEN
as 3:2018cv00058
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
STEVEN EVES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Barnett, Jr. v. Alamance County Sheriff Office
as 18-6113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAMANCE COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE DETENTION CENTER, NURSE JANICE TILLEY, NURSE SUSAN FONTIER and others
:
EVES v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 3:2017cv00217
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
STEVEN EVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bane v. United States of America, The
as 2:2017cv03371
Plaintiff:
Ben W Bane
Defendant:
United States of America, The, Mr Pacheco, Adam Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Stirling et al
as 8:2017cv03337
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Syncere Rivera
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Michael Stephan, Deborah Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stell v. Wright et al
as 6:2017cv00024
Defendant:
Lt. FNU Eves, Hobby Staff Security, Hobby UCC Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Stell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
