Cases 41 - 50 of 69
White v. Eberle et al
as 3:2017cv00717
Plaintiff:
Michael White
Defendant:
Eberle, Cossette, Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stroman v. Pennsylvania Dept. Of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv02543
Plaintiff:
Maurice Stroman
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Dept. Of Corrections, John Wetzel, SCI Huntingdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2016cv02548
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Jones
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Smeal, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. FMC Minnesota et al
as 0:2016cv00845
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
FMC Minnesota , Lt. Holbus , Officer Kepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright, Jason v. Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Wright
Defendant:
Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections, Sauk County Public Defenders Office, Sauk County Dept of Corrections Unit #811 Parole and Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castelare v. Black et al
as 3:2015cv01124
Plaintiff:
Devaris Castelare
Defendant:
Black, Kim Jones, Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trzeciak v. Padilla et al
as 2:2015cv00218
Petitioner:
Joseph Trzeciak, Sr
Defendant:
Nicholas J Padilla, Stewart, Kim Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purtue v. Kearnes et al
as 1:2015cv00551
Plaintiff:
Michael Purtue
Defendant:
B. Kearnes, G. Eberle, S. Rizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collymore v. LaJoie et al
as 3:2014cv01260
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Collymore
Defendant:
Michael LaJoie, Jon Brightaupt, James Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00471
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS WILLIAM RAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID J. HICKTON, CHARLES A. EBERLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
