Cases 41 - 50 of 6,777
Hughes v. FCI Waseca et al
as 0:2024cv03045
Defendant:
FCI Waseca, Goodin, Koziolek and others
Plaintiff:
Lerin Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2024cv01216
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
D'Arius Akim Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gossett v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024hc02138
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
William Edmond Gossett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Andrew Fields v. BOP, et al
as 24-2329
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and A. W. ECKHART
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FIELDS
Clyde Pontefract v. USA, et al
as 24-3629
Plaintiff:
CLYDE PONTEFRACT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FCI ELKTON and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Aragones-Rodriguez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2024cv02786
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Bernadette Aragones-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Owen v. Hall et al
as 4:2024cv00349
Respondent:
Patterson, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mitchell and others
Petitioner:
Lauren M Owen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wallace v. Shuler et al
as 1:2024fp00219
Defendant:
FNU Warner, FNU Sullivan, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Lyneal Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samsel v. Peters et al
as 1:2024cv05027
Defendant:
Ronald Davis, Metropolitan Detention Center Brooklyn Federal Bureau of Prisons, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Samsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
G v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2024cv04321
Defendant:
Ray Garcia, United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) and Darrell Smith
Plaintiff:
C G
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
