Cases 41 - 50 of 2,667
Gomez Munoz v. USA
as 3:2024cv00811
Petitioner:
Francisco Antonio Gomez Munoz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Maximo Gomez v. Danielle Key, et al
as 24-11007
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE MARIE KEY, CHRISTOPHER HELMS and J. HATCHER
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GOMEZ v. KEY et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE KEY KEY, CHRISTOPHER HELMS, J HATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Bridges
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colon v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Irwin Gomez Colon
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOMEZ v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv04190
Plaintiff:
HECTOR L. GOMEZ
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY NEW JERSEY, WARDEN EUGENE CALDWELL and CUMBERLAND COUNTY INSURANCE COMMISSION, INSERVCO INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2024cv01227
Defendant:
SCI CHESTER, CO3 LT. MR. POSADA, COMMONWEALTH OF PA and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael S Gorbey v. Larado et al
as 2:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
Mr. Larado, Mr. Gomez, John Doe A-W Programs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Cutler
as 6:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Martin Gomez
Respondent:
Sheriff Gary Cutler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
