Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 8,236
Stephen Nicholl-Embree v. James George, et al
as 24-1743
Plaintiff: Stephen Robert Nicholl-Embree, also known as Stephen Robert Stark
Defendant: James George, Sargent, Beth Skinner, Director, Stephen Weis, Warden and others
Damper v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02869
Plaintiff: Ray Timothy Damper
Defendant: City Of Chicago, Sebastien A Magiera, J.D. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Bennett
as 1:2024cv02696
Plaintiff: Howard Morris
Defendant: Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardrick v. Howard
as 4:2024cv10912
Petitioner: Bernard Hardrick
Respondent: Howard
Garman v. Watson et al
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Challen Derek Garman
Defendant: James Watson, Beth Skinner, Amber Davis and others
Interested Party: H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Schiffer et al
as 1:2024cv01036
Plaintiff: Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant: Jenniffer B Schiffer, John Addison Howard, Roberl Brisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Navarrete et al
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff: Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant: Jose Navarrete, William Hutchings, Jeniffer Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: Daniel Trotter
Defendant: Wendy Marie Miller, Whithney Conney, Howard Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff: Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant: Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howard v. Shirley et al
as 1:2024cv00387
Plaintiff: Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant: Heather Shirley, James Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?