Cases 41 - 50 of 1,023
Johnson v. Hansen
as 23-1340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROLYN HANSEN
Eugene Johnson v. Marc Magnuson, et al
as 23-3376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene Laron Johnson
Defendant:
Correctional Facility Moose Lake, Kris Rish and Office Special Investigators-OSI
Defendant / Appellee:
Sergeant Marc Magnuson, Lieutenant Rich Skoglund, Captain Crystal Hansen and others
Rubinstein et al v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv12685
Petitioner:
Jacob Rubinstein, Jeffrey Armstrong, Thomas Bauer and others
Respondent:
United States of America
Rodgers v. Hansen
as 3:2023cv05322
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Rodgers
Defendant:
Jeffery B. Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Jones v. Hansen et al
as 1:2023cv01393
Plaintiff:
Sam Jones
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen, Nurse Kim, Nurse Jerry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Jennings et al
as 3:2023cv50376
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Joseph Jennings, Melvin Hinton, C/O Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mugrage v. Starling et al
as 2:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
George Clifford Mugrage
Defendant:
Unknown Starling, Unknown Brooks, Unknown Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lazerek Austin v. Cheryl Hansen, et al
as 23-2946
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAZEREK AUSTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL HANSEN, JOSEPHINA TORREZ-BRADY, PAMELA E. HART and others
Stewart v. Mason County et al
as 3:2023cv05899
Plaintiff:
Breanna L Stewart
Defendant:
Mason County, Kevin Hansen, Shane Schronberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
