Cases 41 - 50 of 1,039
HONEA v. HOGAN et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. HONEA
Defendant:
ALLEGRA HOGAN, MICHAEL AMEZQUITA, MIKE WIZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bishop et al
as 8:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Xavier T. Williams
Defendant:
Michael B. Bishop, Marcus J. Bailey, Steven D. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muniz v. Wheeler et al
as 5:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Mary Muniz
Defendant:
Chad Wheeler, Jamie Wheeler, Ted Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penter v. Hogan et al
as 4:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
Harold Penter
Defendant:
. Hogan, . Shah and Mary Becker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATTERSON v. I.D.O.C et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
AARON PATTERSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C, CENTURION MEDICAL GROUP, J. HADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Close v. Ivy Medical et al
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Brynn Marie Close
Defendant:
Ivy Medical, TFCJ, Doug Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Hanick Hall Medical Department
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Antonio Hogan
Defendant:
Hanick Hall Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Rutherford Correctional Center
as 1:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Francis M. Hogan, Jr.
Defendant:
Rutherford Correctional Center, Larry Godwin, Timothy Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Rutherford Correctional Center
as 5:2023ct03347
Plaintiff:
Francis M. Hogan, Jr.
Defendant:
Rutherford Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hogan v. Barraza, et al.
as 1:2023cv01720
Plaintiff:
Ejaunn C. Hogan
Defendant:
R Barraza, R Espinoa, Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
