Cases 41 - 50 of 707
Bertolo (PS) v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv02763
Defendant:
Sean Burrows, Dean Williams, Andre Moses Stancil and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Bertolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odem v. Townsend
as 23-40583
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Lonnie E. Townsend, Senior Warden, Major Michael A. Collum, Assistant Warden, Melissa J. Mortensen, Case Manager II and others
Johnson v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
Omarr J. Johnson
Defendant:
Multnomah County and Oregon Department of Justice CVSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson (PS) v. Hansen
as 1:2023cv02454
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Carolyn Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Peters et al
as 5:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Johnson
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters, Warden R. Brown and Chaplain Hong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Chapin et al
as 1:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Defendant:
David Chapin, Jessica Aggson, FNU Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamner v. Straughn et al
as 2:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
Charles Straughn, Richard Todd Ball, Natasha Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wieser et al
as 1:2023cv00776
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Defendant:
Phillip Wieser, Jill Brady, Michael Hegarty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Leffler et al
as 4:2023cv04147
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan Leffler, J Johnson, Martin Matherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 23-1273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JILL BRADY, KRUSZKA, BILL ELDER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
