Cases 41 - 50 of 25,858
Jones #347223 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01394
Petitioner:
LC Jones, III
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Joseph et al
as 6:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Clophat Jean Joseph and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roldan v. Nassau County Correction Center et al
as 9:2024cv04167
Plaintiff:
Roberto Roldan
Defendant:
Nassau County Correction Center, James E. Dzurenda, Jone Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATTS et al v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JOHN WATTS, TRAYVON J. TUMER, ELIJAH GIORDINA and others
Defendant:
ABBIE TATE, SHAUN EDMUNSON, BRENDA MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company et al
as 0:2024cv61006
Plaintiff:
Tyrone C. Jones
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, Trustee, for Mortgage Asset Management Series 2 Trust, Kathryn P. Heaven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaughter v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughter
Defendant:
Lt. R. Vaughn, Sgt. Andrews, Ofc. Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04559
Plaintiff:
Theryn Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. Burks-Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Tony Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Nurse Unknown Burks-Jones, Dr. R. Martinez, MD, N.P. Devers and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02110
Petitioner:
Michael Contrez Jones
Respondent:
Warden Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
