Cases 41 - 50 of 194
Abdullah EL et al v. Mayor of Harrisburg et al
as 4:2019cv00083
Defendant:
Warden Brian S. Clark, Chief of Police and Mayor of Harrisburg
Plaintiff:
James Brown, JR. and Melvin Abdullah EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01476
Defendant:
ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00355
Defendant:
ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brown v. USA-2255
as 1:2018cv02408
Petitioner:
Bobby James Brown
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SMITH et al v. MYERS et al
as 1:2018cv02255
Plaintiff:
LOWELL B. SMITH, DONALD G. DOWDEN, KENNETH COLE SIDWELL and others
Defendant:
MATT MYERS, BOOTH and JOHN MARTTOCCA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ et al v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00200
Defendant:
ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN, RAYMOND CASTRO, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brown v. Campbell et al
as 8:2018cv01921
Petitioner:
James Brown
Respondent:
Casey Campbell and Brian E. Frosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, PAUL NOEL, JOSEPH SILVA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Gonsalves et al
as 0:2018cv00404
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Defendant:
S. Gonsalves, Anderson and Kara Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Inch et al
as 0:2018cv00221
Petitioner:
James Brown
Respondent:
Mark S. Inch and David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
