Cases 41 - 50 of 291
Stanfield v. Clement
as 4:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
Katherine Lea Stanfield
Respondent:
Warden Janell Clement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tammons v. St. Clair County Jail
as 3:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Norman Lee Tammons
Defendant:
St. Clair County Jail, Cathy MacElroy, Janelle Bloodworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aery v. Beitel et al
as 0:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
James Paul Aery
Defendant:
Ernie Beitel, Collardra Allen, AJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Janell Robinson
Respondent:
T. Pullen and Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Knetzer et al
as 2:2021cv01383
Plaintiff:
Tommy Edward Jackson
Defendant:
Sgt Knetzer, Officer Eickholt, Janelle Kleeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hentschel et al
as 2:2021cv01597
Plaintiff:
Alan Justin Smith
Defendant:
Kristin Hentschel, Mike Stone, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vreeland v. Voightsberger et al
as 0:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Delmart EJM Vreeland, II
Defendant:
Carl Voightsberger, Michael Pacheco, Mr G Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scharon v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 1:2021cv00895
Plaintiff:
Roberto J Scharon
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Milwaukee County, Sgt Thomas Livesey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claypool v. Evers et al
as 2:2021cv00571
Defendant:
Angela Thompson, Austin J Korman, Kira Labby and others
Plaintiff:
Bryant K Claypool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loonsfoot et al v. Brogan, et al
as 2:2021cv00089
Respondent:
William W. Jondreau, Joseph Brogan and Violet Aires
Petitioner:
Janelle Joyce Loonsfoot and Gavin Carl Loonsfoot
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
