Cases 41 - 50 of 123
Johnson v. United States et al
as 1:2019cv01381
Defendant:
United States, John Doe, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamont Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. FCI MCKEAN WARDEN
as 1:2019cv00156
Respondent:
FCI MCKEAN WARDEN and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
JAMES LAMONT JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv02034
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Maurice Lamont Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Harris et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00174
Plaintiff:
John Boatfield, Bruce Smiley, Lamont Johnson and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, State of Tennessee, Tennessee Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00604
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00574
Petitioner:
Eric Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson et al v. Buncombe Co. N.C. et al
as 3:2018cv00179
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Lamont Johnson and Bradley A. Thomas
Defendant:
Buncombe Co. N.C., Walter D. Cum, Jr., Tenn. Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Buncombe Co. N.C. et al
as 1:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Lamont Johnson and Bradley A. Thomas
Defendant:
Buncombe Co. N.C., Walter D. Cum, Jr., Tenn. Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2018cv00041
Petitioner:
Ceddrick Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
