Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Paul Farnsworth v. Thomas Mills, et al
as 08-5345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL FARNSWORTH, aka Ronnie B. Bradfield
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS MILLS, Warden, LARRY SPAYS, Food Director, MICHAEL YOUNG, Asst. Food Director and others
Young v. Williams et al
as 1:2008cv00302
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Defendant:
L. Williams, Mr. Cintron, Mr. Wizon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Obie et al
as 1:2008cv00200
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Defendant:
Ms. Obie, C Smith, Chieff Hargraves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. CLEARFIELD COUNTY COMMONWEALTH OF PLEAS et al
as 3:2008cv00005
Petitioner:
DEREK MICHAEL YOUNG
Respondent:
CLEARFIELD COUNTY COMMONWEALTH OF PLEAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Lafler et al
as 2:2007cv12561
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Defendant:
Blaine Lafler, Rivard, Kushion and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv01568
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Farnsworth v. Mills et al
as 1:2007cv01009
Plaintiff:
Paul Farnsworth
Defendant:
Thomas Mills, Larry Spays, Michael Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIENAAR v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2007cv00609
Plaintiff:
BEN PIENAAR
Defendant:
MICHAEL YOUNG, MARC JUDGE ROTHENBERG, STATE OF OHIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farnsworth v. Mills et al
as 1:2007cv01101
Plaintiff:
Paul Farnsworth
Defendant:
Thomas Mills, Larry Seays, Michael Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Jones
as 5:2007cv00230
Petitioner:
Michael Young
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
