Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Peach v. Joslin
as 2:2010cv00027
Petitioner:
Michael C Peach
Respondent:
Dan Joslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peach v. Joslin
as 2:2010cv00020
Petitioner:
Michael C Peach
Respondent:
Dan Joslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lien v. Murphy et al
as 5:2009cv03193
Plaintiff:
George Fred Lien
Defendant:
Michael J. Murphy, Kya Gallo, Dawn Sides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Concepcion v. Dowd et al
as 6:2008cv02130
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Concepcion
Defendant:
Denis Dowd, Joyce Peach, Wm. Michael Bibb and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches #40948-018 v. Lahiri et al
as 2:2008cv00141
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches #40948-018
Respondent:
Jhumpa Lahiri, Martin Amis, Kurt Vonnegut and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perez v. Dowd et al
as 6:2008cv00513
Plaintiff:
Melvin Perez
Defendant:
Denis Dowd, Michael A. Tidwell, Joyce Peach and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shupe v. Wyoming Department of Correcti, et al
as 07-8087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD DAVID SHUPE, JR.
Plaintiff:
RANDY DEAN MORGANFLASH
Defendant - Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC, ROBERT O. LAMPERT, in his official capacity as Wyoming Department of Corrections Director and individually and others
Peach v. Williams et al
as 2:2007cv00100
Petitioner:
Edward I. Peach
Respondent:
Thalrone Williams and T.S. Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEACH v. JETT
as 2:2007cv00233
Petitioner:
MICHAEL C PEACH
Respondent:
B. R. JETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniels v. Peach et al
as 3:2007cv00514
Plaintiff:
Frank Edward Daniels, Jr.
Defendant:
John W. Peach, Kimberly Sedor and Young Kwon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
