Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Boring v. Jones et al
as 6:2020cv06161
Defendant:
Members of US Congress, John Doe Director of DEA, Judge Barry Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
David Boring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grishan v. Jones et al
as 6:2020cv06156
Defendant:
Members of US Congress, John Doe Director of DEA, Judge Barry Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Albert Grishan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Jones et al
as 6:2020cv06148
Defendant:
Members of US Congress, John Doe Director of DEA, Judge Barry Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Addison v. Jones et al
as 6:2020cv06151
Defendant:
Members of US Congress, John Doe Director of DEA, Judge Barry Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Addison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burchfield v. Jones et al
as 6:2020cv06135
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Burchfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Davis
as 6:2020cv00227
Defendant:
Richard . Davis
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Davis et al
as 2:2019cv04502
Plaintiff:
Taywyn Mason
Defendant:
Tadd Sickle, Sgt. Richard Davis and Lt. Ernest Newland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheeler v. Pickaway Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2019cv03512
Defendant:
Deputy Warden, Investigator Richard Davis, Caughman and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Dejuan Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rotchford v. Davies et al
as 3:2019cv05154
Defendant:
Jefferson Associated Counsel, JCAC, Ashley Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Fraser Rotchford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv01416
Defendant:
R. McLaughim, Richard Davis and MN Santare
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Mayo
Consolidated Defendant:
Kathleen A. Ortiz and Norfolk Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.