Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Rushton v. USA
as 4:2020cv01390
Petitioner:
Tequan Rushton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Donald Ray Pierre v. Rushton E. Halbert
as 2:2019cv04752
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Pierre
Defendant:
Rushton E. Halbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
Rushton v. Lewis
as 1:2016cv00056
Petitioner:
Stanley C. Rushton, Sr.
Respondent:
Robert Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Booker v. Haley et al
as 2:2015cv04303
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Booker
Defendant:
Nikki R Haley, Brian P Stirling, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Kelley v. Marc Ferguson, et al
as 15-2211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS KELLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARC FERGUSON, TIM NORTON, UNKNOWN PANKEY and others
Calvin Thompson v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 15-3367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN H. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COL. R. J. RUSHTON, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI FRACKVILLE/MAHANOY and others
THOMPSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv04928
Plaintiff:
CALVIN H. THOMPSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, RUSHTON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SCI FRACKVILLE/MAHANOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
