Cases 41 - 50 of 4,583
Shaun A. Jones v. C.O. Moisa et al
as 2:2024cv01819
Plaintiff:
Shaun A. Jones
Defendant:
C.O. Moisa, Sgt. John Doe One, John Doe One and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PORTO CARRERO v. OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
WALBERTO SANCHEZ PORTO CARRERO
Defendant:
OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Molina v. Sanchez Balderas et al
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Herrado Jose Molina
Defendant:
Officer Perla K. Sanchez Balderas, Officer Mishel A. Cabrerra, Asst. Warden Candica G. Flannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lusk v. Santa Rita Jail et al
as 4:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
William Lusk, III
Defendant:
Santa Rita Jail, County of Alameda and Yesina Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 24-1106
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
JILL BRADY, JENNA KRUSZKA, CATHERINE SHEA and others
Lovell v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2024cv02071
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Lovell, II
Defendant:
Deputy Sanchez and Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Sanchez
as 24-40146
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
R. Sanchez, K. Garza, Unknown Morchequo and others
Travis v. Mason Jr. et al
as 9:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Paul Travis
Defendant:
Officer Mason Jr., Corporal Sanchez, Dr. Pathmalingam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Samuel Sanchez, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giagnacovo v. Romero et al
as 4:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Hector Damian Giagnacovo
Defendant:
Romero, Sanchez, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
