Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 22,200
Clayton v. Brittain et al
as 3:2024cv01211
Defendant: Kerri Moore, Bill Napenburg, Karen Holly and others
Plaintiff: Steven A. Clayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Robinson et al
as 4:2024cv04987
Defendant: Prosecutor Clemons, Michael Robinson, Judge Michael Nettles and others
Plaintiff: Kendris Richard Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv02534
Defendant: Unknown
Plaintiff: Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ross
as 1:2024cv00433
Respondent: Russels Ross
Petitioner: Steven L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pink v. Harpe et al
as 5:2024cv00969
Defendant: Nona Battles, R Gulbert, Tommy Sharp and others
Plaintiff: Johnny L Hardeman and Lo Re Pink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heisch v. Fennell et al
as 3:2024cv03206
Defendant: Shelbi Russell, . Fairless, . Young and others
Plaintiff: Eva Heisch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cupp v. Warden, USP Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00145
Respondent: Warden, USP Hazelton
Petitioner: Steven Orville Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Desouze v. Ratzinger et al
as 4:2024cv02890
Defendant: Jorge Marie Bergoglio, George Walker Bush, Joseph Ratzinger and others
Plaintiff: Neville Ambrose Desouze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00592
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. Maddeica et al
as 1:2024cv01046
Defendant: Jennifer Maddeica and Zachary S. Stirparo
Plaintiff: Steven Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?