Cases 41 - 50 of 665
William Webb, Jr. v. Department of Justice, et al
as 22-3268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM JOSEPH WEBB, JR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Administrates Justice, ISLANDA L. FINAMORE, Deputy Attorney General, JOELLE P. HITCH, Judge - Famly Court, New Castle County and others
Raynel Dorrough v. Suzanne Peery
as 22-56109
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYNEL DORROUGH
Respondent / Appellee:
SUZANNE M. PEERY, Warden
ISHRAT v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
KHALIQ ADEEB ISHRAT
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, MS. SUZANNE FORTNER and CONE HEALTH GROUP (CONE HOSPITALS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maslow v. Warden et al
as 1:2022cv04351
Petitioner:
Thomas Maslow
Respondent:
Warden, Honorable Mrs. Suzanne Smith and Mrs. Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maslow v. Warden et al
as 4:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Thomas Maslow
Respondent:
Warden, Honorable Mrs. Suzanne Smith, Mrs. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Rolando L Diaz
Defendant:
Ron D Neal, C Frediarelli, G Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagos v. Goodwill et al
as 2:2022cv01436
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
Goodwill, Seattle Police Department, City of Seattle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bonilla v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv05430
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Linda R. Clark, Judge Raymond Davilla, Jr., Judge Suzanne N. Kingsburys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
