Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Brewer v. Gilroy et al
as 6:2013cv00471
Plaintiff:
Danny Dewayne Brewer
Defendant:
Deana Gilroy, Pentley, Pavlukevick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv03578
Petitioner:
WILLIAM TAYLOR
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Taylor v. Corrections Corporation of Ame, et al
as 13-5309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ALLEN, Educational Instructor, GRAY, Librarian and others
Barnett v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eugene Barnett
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Randall Workman, William Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv01170
Plaintiff:
James William Taylor
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Allen, Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. McCall et al
as 9:2011cv02737
Plaintiff:
William Taylor
Defendant:
Michael McCall, Ms Snyder and R L Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Scott et al
as 6:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Victor Cornell Miller
Defendant:
Wade Scott, Robert Compton, D. D. Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Sockey, et al
as 11-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
DELGREGO v. TAYLOR
as 4:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
ERICA JEANNE DELGREGO
Defendant:
WILLIAM TAYLOR, PAIGE AUGUSTINE, GINA PEDRONI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James D Maciel, Sr. v. William Taylor et al
as 2:2011cv03599
Defendant:
P Balderas, P Balderas, Hector H Cardiel and others
Plaintiff:
James D Maciel, Sr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
