Cases 51 - 60 of 579
Gordon v. USA
as 1:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Brandon Best Gordon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wilkins v. Lumpkin et al
as 3:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
Ralph Sherman Wilkins
Defendant:
Ben Woodard, John Best and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Ralph Sherman Wilkins
Defendant:
Ben Woodard, John Best and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Driver v. Best et al
as 2:2022cv01542
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr
Defendant:
Best, Xiong, Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gipson v. IRS Officer Harper et al
as 3:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
Jerald Gipson
Defendant:
IRS Officer Harper, Columbia Correctional Institution, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Hill v. Ehelers et al
as 2:2022cv01468
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill and Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Helers, Avila, Haciendor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Butler v. Edward Hull
as 22-6903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT EDWARD HULL, a/k/a Ted Hull, NURSE HRYN, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT PHYLLIS BACK, a/k/a Back and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL and NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL BOARD
Branch v. Best Reward Federal Credit Union
as 1:2022cv01356
Plaintiff:
Marcus A Branch
Defendant:
Best Reward Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holmes v. Willis et al
as 4:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes
Defendant:
Cpl Willis, Sgt. Baxter, Cpl. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. eHelers et al
as 4:2022cv04315
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
eHelers, Avila, Haciendor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
