Cases 51 - 60 of 177
Crawford v. Hughes
as 18-2216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas L. Crawford
Defendant - Appellee:
Officer Christopher Wegner
Defendant:
Superintendent M. Bradt, Sergeant Cheney, Nurse K. Sault and others
Smalls v. Simple et al
as 3:2018cv01142
Defendant:
Anaya, Paxton, Putnam and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Smalls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cheney v. Judd
as 1:2018cv00385
Petitioner:
Logan Cheney
Respondent:
Betty Judd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hanks v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2018cv00686
Plaintiff:
Jason Hanks
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Miles Kranz, Janelle M. Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cheney v. LNU
as 1:2018cv00218
Petitioner:
Logan Cheney
Respondent:
Betty Judd and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cheney v. Dean et al
as 1:2018cv00196
Plaintiff:
Logan Patrick Cheney
Defendant:
John A. Dean, Michael P. Sanchez and Mark Curnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deertz v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv03011
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Deertz
Defendant:
Jerry Williams , Dean , Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy et al v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2017fp00715
Defendant:
FNU Anzel, Jose Aviles, FNU Bachelder and others
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Broderick, Michael Cheney, Chad E. Evans and others
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ClarkWillis #726262 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Julius C. ClarkWillis #726262
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Robert Napel, Tom Prisk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grayson v. Cheney et al
as 1:2017cv01818
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dennis Grayson
Defendant:
Cheney and Adams County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
