Cases 51 - 60 of 2,703
Green v. Branham et al
as 4:2023cv00976
Plaintiff:
Christopher Green
Defendant:
Curry Branham, Mixon, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Wise et al
as 4:2023cv05143
Plaintiff:
Robert Hill and Robert J Hill
Defendant:
Todd Wise, Jon Coers, Aaron Kershaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Branham et al
as 4:2023cv00974
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Wilson
Defendant:
Curry Branham, Mixon, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gotoy v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Shahied Gotoy
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Jeremy Bean, Omar Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00583
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Easom v. Mello et al
as 1:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
Warren Edwin Easom
Defendant:
Maia Mello, Clayton Joseph Lance and Curry County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Curry County Detention Center
as 2:2023cv00866
Plaintiff:
John Michael Chavez
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easom v. Lance et al
as 6:2023cv01409
Plaintiff:
Warren Edwin Easom
Defendant:
Clayton J. Lance, Maia Mello, Curry County, OR, Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Devos et al
as 3:2023cv05865
Petitioner:
William Curry, Jr
Respondent:
Keith Devos, Brian Judd, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Gerhardt et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Defendant:
M. Wayne Gerhardt, Jude Washington, Michael T. Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
