Cases 51 - 60 of 119
De La Rosa v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2015cv00715
Plaintiff:
Rodney Cabrera De La Rosa
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Rosa v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2015cv00625
Plaintiff:
Rodney Cabrera De La Rosa
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Durango Jail Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. De La Rosa et al
as 2:2015cv00566
Plaintiff:
Ryan Robert Evans
Defendant:
Unknown De La Rosa, Unknown Jenkins, Unknown Tennyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Rosa v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2015cv00569
Plaintiff:
Rodney Cabrera De La Rosa
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Nolte Contrerras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Livingston et al
as 7:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
John Jackson
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Phillip Rodriguez, James Hales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Charles Cleveland v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2015cv01399
Defendant:
B Avalos, LeRoy Baca, Sergeant Ceci Barajas and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Charles Cleveland
De-La-Rosa-Meran v. USA
as 3:2015cv01041
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Leo De-La-Rosa-Meran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
De La Rosa-Rangel v. United States of America DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. DOCKET ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN 6:14-CR-25.
as 6:2014cv00069
Petitioner:
Jorge De La Rosa-Rangel
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hernandez-De-La-Rosa v. US
as 14-2191
Petitioner - Appellant:
CESAR HERNANDEZ-DE-LA-ROSA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
RAFAEL ANGLADA-LOPEZ and ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ-IZQUIERDO, SR.
Pianka v. De La Rosa et al
as 2:2014cv02445
Respondent:
Charles De La Rosa and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Victor Pianka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
