Cases 51 - 60 of 1,062
Peters v. Moore et al
as 3:2023cv01112
Defendant:
Brian English, Moore, Gapski and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew W Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allan Walker v. Wexford of Indiana, LLC, et al
as 24-1222
Plaintiff:
ALLAN WALKER
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, DOCTOR MERONDIT, DOCTOR KEENZLY and others
Tyson v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tyson
Defendant:
Paul English, N. Tote, C/o Sinclair of Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foor v. English et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Phillip Zachary Foor
Defendant:
English, Dentist, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAZ v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
ROLANDO DIAZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL, ENGLISH, WADHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Council et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council, Kinetik Justice, Lee Edward Moore, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. United States
as 4:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
James E. Murphy
Defendant:
Ms. White, N.C. English, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
REDDING v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv24741
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL REDDING
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH, R BETHEA, JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Cummings v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
Defendant:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, Deputy Superintendent, CHRISTOPHER SYMONS, Deputy Superintendent, C.O. LUKE ERDMAN and others
HOWARD v. ENGLISH
as 3:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL HOWARD
Defendant:
LT. ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
