Cases 51 - 60 of 4,132
Abdikarim v. Fargo, City of et al
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Fargo, City of, Chief of Police Fargo, ND, Chief of Police West Fargo, ND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mora v. Fuentes et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mora
Defendant:
Mary Fuentes, Adrian Munoz, Jerry Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse McComb v. Robert Wineman, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JESSE MCCOMB
Defendant:
ROBERT WINEMAN, MARY MOORE, SHERYL PIERRE and others
Chafin v. Caudill et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chafin
Defendant:
Steve Caudill, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Joseph Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Bierman
as 5:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Michael Jesse Martinez
Defendant:
Officer David Bierman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wise v. Leu
as 2:2024cv00171
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Wise and Haley Ann Wise
Respondent:
David Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davenport v. State of California's State and Communities Correction Board et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Jesse Davenport and Jesse L. Davenport
Defendant:
State of California's State and Communities Correction Board and Mendocino County Corrections Facilities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Lovett et al
as 1:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Jesse Jacobs
Defendant:
. Lovett, Bureau of Prisons, U S of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
