Cases 51 - 60 of 306
HUBBARD v. BEGUHN et al
as 1:2018cv02692
Plaintiff:
BYRON HUBBARD
Defendant:
JENNIFER FRENCH, MARY ANN WILKINSON, LARA D. MCNEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2018cv01255
Defendant:
Evaristo Aguinaldo, Latonya Williams, Parathasarathi Gosh and others
Plaintiff:
Aloysius M Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2018cv00321
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
MARY ANN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2018cv01513
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
MARY ANN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. David et al
as 3:2018cv01344
Defendant:
Melissa, Penny George, Dr. David and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera v. Paramo et al
as 3:2018cv01514
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, John Does, Scott Kernan and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Daniel Chairez Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Herrera v. Paramo et al
as 3:2018cv01515
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, John Does, Scott Kernan and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Daniel Chairez Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Davis v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv03053
Plaintiff:
Marvin Davis
Defendant:
Tom Davis and Mary Ann Blend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brennan et al v. Kelly et al
as 2:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Kyle L. Brennan , Patrick D. Church and Brian L. Iles
Defendant:
Emma C. Kelly , Charles Kelly , Mary Ann Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Kelley et al
as 5:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
Peter Keith Harvey
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Mary Ann Wilkinson and Stacy Roebuck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
