Cases 51 - 60 of 246
Peace v. Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 4:2020cv00713
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Peace and Tara T. Peace
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Ms. Melinda Taylor, S. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peace v. Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 1:2020cv00215
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Ms. Melinda Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Tara T Peace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peace v. Royce
as 1:2020cv00389
Petitioner:
Shawn Peace
Respondent:
Superintendent Mark Royce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOOZER v. PEACE et al
as 3:2019cv00201
Defendant:
BARRY R. SMITH, LISA R. PEACE and MUHAMMAD NAJI
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. BOOZER, SR. and RICHARD LONEY BOOZER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Taylor v. Wright et al
as 4:2019cv03235
Defendant:
Deputy R. Williams, Ebony Black, Sergeant Kyle W. Center and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingler v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 3:2019cv02737
Defendant:
Chubbs Wrecker & Impound, Southern Health Partners, Cptn. FNU Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kelly Dingler and Joseph Dingler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regan v. Peace et al
as 1:2019cv01362
Defendant:
. Tracy, Gish, Peace and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GHOLSON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00175
Defendant:
DAVID CLOSE, PEACE, PAMELA S. OLIVER and others
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Peace v. State of Texas et al
as 7:2019cv00116
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L Peace
Defendant:
James V Allred Unit, Unit Medical Staff and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regan v. Peace et al
as 1:2019cv06487
Defendant:
Gish, Peace, Nurse Tracy and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
