Cases 51 - 60 of 89
Alexander v. Hoffman et al
as 2:2015cv10294
Plaintiff:
D'Andre Alexander
Defendant:
A. Hoffman, Flaugher, ONietzel and others
Putman v. Superintendent
as 3:2014cv02045
Petitioner:
Antonio Putman
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terry Campbell v. Ingles Market
as 14-6989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY DOUGLAS CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
INGLES MARKET, Ingles Store 92, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER FOLK, TRAVIS TODD KING and others
Defendant:
SPTG CO SHERIFFS DEPT
LATHAM v. S.C.I. GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2014cv03936
Plaintiff:
JOHN LATHAM
Defendant:
S.C.I. GRATERFORD, CORIZON HEALTH INC., JAFAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latham v. S.C.I. Graterford et al
as 3:2014cv01222
Plaintiff:
John Latham
Defendant:
S.C.I. Graterford, Corizon Health Inc., Jafar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENNIS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2014cv00150
Respondent:
GREG BALLARD, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, MICHAEL PENCE and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Putman #250120 v. Haas
as 1:2014cv00538
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Putman #250120
Respondent:
Randall Haas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Ingles Market et al
as 7:2013cv01701
Plaintiff:
Terry Douglas Campbell
Defendant:
Ingles Market, Michael Christopher Folk, Travis Todd King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jose Rodriguez v. F. Putman, et al
as 13-56079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE CARLOS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
F. PUTMAN, individual and official capacity, L. STEPHENS, individual and official capacity, B. RUSSELL, individual and official capacity and others
Campbell v. Ingles Store 92 et al
as 7:2013cv01138
Plaintiff:
Terry Douglas Campbell
Defendant:
Ingles Store 92, Michael Christopher Folk, Travis Todd King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
