Cases 61 - 70 of 266
Culberson v. Carwright et al
as 2:2020cv00385
Plaintiff:
Michael Culberson
Defendant:
Wilson, J. Carwright, Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAVES et al v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2020cv00147
Plaintiff:
JEREME CARTWRIGHT and KEVIN L. REAVES
Defendant:
KATHY ALVEY and INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTWRIGHT v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2020cv00146
Plaintiff:
JERRME CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
KATHY ALVEY and INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hook v. McCray et al
as 1:2020cv21767
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc. Now, R.M.C. Colonel, Dr. Sharma and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Short v. Cartwright et al
as 4:2020cv00375
Defendant:
Brian Shelton, Jr, James Gibson, Brandon James and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Dean Short
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez-Agosto v. Helder et al
as 5:2020cv05058
Defendant:
Corporal Rex, Sheriff Tim Helder and Deputy Cartwright
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gabriele Rodriguez-Agosto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prejean v. Jefferson Davis Parish Jail et al
as 1:2020cv00323
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office Jefferson Davis Parish, Georgia Correctional Health, Ivy Woods and others
Plaintiff:
David J Prejean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prejean v. Jefferson Davis Parish Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office Jefferson Davis Parish, Georgia Correctional Health, Ivy Woods and others
Plaintiff:
David J Prejean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Dowling et al
as 4:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Dan Ross, Tami Cartwright, Janett Dowling and others
Plaintiff:
Roscoe LarRett Morris, I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2020cv00158
Defendant:
Morris, Jane Doe 1, Cartwright and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
