Cases 61 - 70 of 41,807
Jerry v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Aonrai C. Jerry #614415
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, John Davis, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02107
Petitioner:
Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Fields, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall Harris, Sr. v. Denise Bonnett, et al
as 24-1963
Plaintiff:
RANDALL E. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
DENISE BONNETT, ANN MUELLER and AARONN OECHSNER
Johnson v. State of Florida (Hendry)
as 2:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Johnson
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SNELLING v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
MARTY E. SNELLING
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024ct03141
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
Darren G. Jackson, Graham H. Atkinson, Gregory K. Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Markeke et al
as 5:2024ct03140
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Officer Markeke, Sergeant Hall, Lieutenant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Class v. Lumpkin
as 24-10483
Petitioner:
Luis E. Class
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
David Feathers v. Stephen Reynolds
as 24-3466
Petitioner:
DAVID E. FEATHERS
Respondent:
STEPHEN REYNOLDS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
