Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Peck v. Foulk
as 2:2013cv01265
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Peck, Jr.
Respondent:
F. Foulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Wernicke v. Corizon Health Care Services, et al
as 13-10880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ROBERT WERNICKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH CARE SERVICES and CHARLOTTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Wernicke v. J Al Cannon, Jr
as 8:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Wernicke
Defendant:
J Al Cannon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Barefoot v. USA
as 5:2012cv00715
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Wernicke v. Corizon Health Care Services et al
as 2:2012cv00579
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Wernicke
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Services and Charlotte County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mescall v. University Medical Center et al
as 2:2012cv00927
Defendant:
Esq. Danae Adams, Franklin Akioyame, Ralph Aquino and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Mescall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Barefoot, Jr. v. Nurse Derry
as 12-6875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ROBERT BAREFOOT, JR.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN GATON and RICHARD DANIEL HONEYCUTT
Defendant - Appellee:
NURSE DERRY, DOCTOR GONZALEZ, OFFICER HILL and others
Defendant:
CAMPOS, SARAH REVELL, Warden and WARDEN BEELER
Canter v. O'Malley et al
as 8:2011cv00918
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Canter, III
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley , Ragena Benjamen, Gary D. Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browder v. Kentucky State Prison Officials
as 5:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Browder, Jr.
Defendant:
Kentucky State Prison Officials, Phillip Parker, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Charles Barlow
as 10-60880
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES ROBERT BARLOW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
