Cases 61 - 70 of 141
Poole v. Masony et al
as 2:2018cv00457
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Kimberly Roberts, Marie Nembhard and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Poole, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Greenville, County of et al
as 2:2018cv02032
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Greenville, County of, Christopher T Posey, South Carolina, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Kelley et al
as 1:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Angela Schuncey Richardson
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Dexter Payne, Tami Jo Aiken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. USA, et al
as 18-11988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BRIAN CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON and BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES
Johnson v. Calloway
as 2:2018cv02085
Petitioner:
Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
Victor Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Meacham v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv04551
Plaintiff:
Mark Meacham
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Joseph Pitz, David Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. USA
as 5:2017cv00185
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Leonard Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Tucker et al
as 1:2017cv02739
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Bruce Tucker, Christopher Kinne, William Elbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erven Walls v. Christopher Johnson, et al
as 17-1525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERVEN WALLS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Intel Officer and Correctional Officer, Centralia Correctional Center, THOMAS AUSTIN, Assistant Warden of Operations, Former Warden of Programs, Centralia Correctional Center, THEODORE W. MCBEE and others
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00044
Petitioner:
Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
