Cases 61 - 70 of 21,166
Edwards v. Borla
as 3:2024cv07447
Petitioner:
Walter L. Edwards
Respondent:
Warden Edward J. Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brazier v. Borla
as 3:2024cv02013
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Petitioner:
Kevin Deon Brazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neveu, Sr. v. Sheriff, Angelina County
as 9:2024cv00204
Petitioner:
Edward Anthony Neveu, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden- Angelina County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lumsden v. Lumpkin
as 24-40689
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Lumsden
Riddle v. McDowell Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Charlie Edward Riddle
Defendant:
FNU Administrations, Chris Taylor, Ricky Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verdi-Bruno v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv02441
Petitioner:
Edward Verdi-Bruno
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Edwards v. Kaur et al
as 1:2024cv12786
Plaintiff:
Andre A Shantay-Samo-Ne Edwards
Defendant:
Brandon Price, Kaur and Lloyd
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Edwards v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv03997
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Allen Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Juneau v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv03998
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Edward Juneau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(PC) Tionson v Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv02898
Plaintiff:
Larry L Tionson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Macomber, Steven Posson and Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
