Cases 61 - 70 of 2,619
Williams v. Floyde et al
as 5:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Williams
Defendant:
Elizabeth Floyde, Joseph Crosswhite, Sam Winthrop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Floyd County Jail
as 4:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Argen Franklin Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
Floyd County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Shelby County Tennessee Government et al
as 2:2023cv02729
Plaintiff:
Davey Floyd
Defendant:
Shelby County Tennessee Government, WellPath, LLC, Reginald Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pitts v. LeBlanc
as 23-30811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Willie R. Pitts
Defendant / Appellee:
James M. LeBlanc, Travis Day and Floyd Brooks
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Shane Weber
as 23-7143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SHANE WEBER, CHIEF OF SECURITY KEITH ARNOLD, LT. JAMES SMITH and others
Hunt v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Semons v. Gilbert et al
as 2:2023cv01497
Plaintiff:
Floyd L Semons
Defendant:
Breanna M Gilbert and Hannah Utter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pipkin v. Coffee et al
as 2:2023cv02714
Petitioner:
Byron Pipkin
Respondent:
Lee V. Coffee and Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mishoe v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam County)
as 3:2023cv01204
Petitioner:
Floyd L. Mishoe
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Broward Sheriff Office
as 0:2023cv62074
Plaintiff:
Floyd Allen Washington
Defendant:
Broward Sheriff Office of North
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
