Cases 61 - 70 of 14,172
Burton v. Frederick
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Shasta Burton
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fisher v. Javois
as 2:2024cv04063
Petitioner:
George W Fisher
Respondent:
Laurent Javois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francis v. Quachita Parish Corrections, et al
as 2:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Henry Ray Francis
Defendant:
Quachita Parish Corrections, Unidentified Parties, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALSTON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2024cv01574
Plaintiff:
LAMAR ALSTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, SUPT. SORBER, SUPT. TERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. State of Miss.
as 1:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
George Verlon Hawkins
Respondent:
State of Miss.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TENNEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv01095
Petitioner:
GEORGE AMOS TENNEY, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ashby v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
George Patrick Ashby
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-5044
Plaintiff:
DAVID GEORGE CLARK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, KEVIN STITT, Governor, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director and others
Clark v. Withers et al
as 6:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Warden Shannon Withers and George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Withers et al
as 5:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Shannon Withers and FNU George
Petitioner:
Ciaran Paul Redmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
