Cases 61 - 70 of 1,024
Spivey v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2023cv05234
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Spivey
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Mindi, Warden Pontiac C.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
Rodney Williams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Alberto Butalid, Vipin Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mericle v. Hansen et al
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Carrie Mericle
Defendant:
Elaine Hansen and Polk County Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collett v. Mason County et al
as 3:2023cv05654
Plaintiff:
Mathew Collett
Defendant:
Mason County, Kevin Hansen, John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hansen v. Billingsly
as 2:2023cv01349
Petitioner:
David Henry Hansen
Respondent:
James Billingsly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Crenshaw v. Leyton et al
as 2:2023cv11607
Plaintiff:
DeMario Reed Crenshaw
Defendant:
David S. Leyton and Karen Hansen
Fouts v. Houlton et al
as 3:2023cv05594
Plaintiff:
Nathan Bradley Fouts
Defendant:
Dion, Medical Director, Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintana v. Shewy, et al
as 23-4085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SHEWY, EDWIN S. WALL, RON FUJINO and others
Morris v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2023cv01159
Plaintiff:
William Allen Morris
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Unknown Party, Chandler, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. State of Wisconsin Division of Hearing and Appeals et al
as 2:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
Michael G Scott
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Division of Hearing and Appeals, Christine L Hansen, Andrew Riedmaier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
