Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 319
Miller v. Soto We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv05386
Plaintiff: Christopher J. Miller
Defendant: Sergeant M. Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv09897
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CAPTAIN J. MILLER, MOHAMED MOAHAREK and others
Plaintiff: KEVIN ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2020cv03677
Defendant: MOHAMED MOAHAREK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DR. J MILLER and others
Plaintiff: KEVIN ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITAKER v. MILLER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv05643
Defendant: M CABAN and J MILLER
Plaintiff: ISHMAEL WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. Miller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2020cv00155
Defendant: Jeremy W. Larue, Ronnie J. Miller and Kent Dickerson
Plaintiff: Robert Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2020cv01935
Plaintiff: Marc Miller and Mark J. Miller
Defendant: Executive Director of CDOC and Warden of Sterling Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Davis
as 4:2020cv01996
Petitioner: Jerry J Miller
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brewbaker v. Miller
as 4:2020cv00114
Respondent: Thomas J. Miller
Interested Party: Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner: Chad Brewbaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Suh et al
as 2:2020cv00488
Defendant: Joe DeCamp, Stuart Young, Judy Gilmore and others
Plaintiff: Clarence Eugene Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant: COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff: RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?