Cases 61 - 70 of 91
MCCURDY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2013cv00277
Plaintiff:
MARK MCCURDY
Defendant:
DONALD SMITH and BETSY FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milaudi Karboau v. Lowell Clark, et al
as 13-35585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILAUDI KARBOAU
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWELL CLARK, GEO), MACHOTTEN, GEO), GEORGE WIGGEN, GEO) and others
Laurice McCurdy v. Lisa Alvarez, et al
as 13-16270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAURICE MCCURDY
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA ALVAREZ, Officer, MICHAEL NEIMAN, Officer, SHIRLEY COBB and others
McCurdy v. Seaburns et al
as 6:2013cv00363
Plaintiff:
Darrell Seaburn McCurdy
Defendant:
Seaburns LLP, TD Hammons, Karla D Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCurdy v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00032
Petitioner:
Tyler McCurdy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
US v. Spencer Bowen
as 13-6184
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SPENCER BOWENS, a/k/a Scooter, a/k/a Clyde, a/k/a Melvin McCurdy, a/k/a Doc Johnson
McCurdy v. Bender et al
as 7:2012cv03001
Plaintiff:
Santos Nazzarra McCurdy
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Roxanna Bender, James Reddoch and Catherine Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eremo v. State of Nevada
as 2:2012cv00894
Defendant:
James Allen, Thomas Goodson, Susan J. McCurdy and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Eremo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Laurice McCurdy v. Mark Paresi, et al
as 12-15574
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAURICE MCCURDY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK PARESI, Chief, NAPH CARE INC., S. JOHNSON, #1657 and others
McCurdy v. Doe et al
as 2:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
Rex A McCurdy
Defendant:
Chris Lamont and Magistrate Judge Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
