Cases 61 - 70 of 854
Miranda-Ortiz v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00075
Petitioner:
Brian Miranda-Ortiz
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Morales et al
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luz Maria Aguilar Morales, EduardoTomas Medina Mora Icaza, Lilia Monica Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Houston v. Joe Lombardo, et al
as 23-15067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff, CAROLYN GOODMAN, MIRANDA M. DU and others
(PC) Mundy v. Cavello et al
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Stanley W. Mundy
Defendant:
Patrick Cavello, T. Miranda, M. Ullery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Lilley et al
as 9:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sabas Martinez
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilley, Lefield, Captain T. Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor Sanchez Alcantar v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Victor Sanchez Alcantar
Respondent:
Madden, ., Mrs. Pays and Mr Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Armenta v. Miranda et al
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Richard Armenta
Defendant:
Rafael Miranda, K. Reuter, B. Kiebler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dena Minton v. Miranda Richardson
as 23-6010
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENA INEZ MINTON
Respondent / Appellee:
MIRANDA B. RICHARDSON
Hughes (ID 105577) v. Graham et al
as 5:2022cv03309
Plaintiff:
Da'Shawn M. Hughes and Dashawn M. Hughes
Defendant:
Jim Graham, Paul Cary, Miranda Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
