Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Hamilton v. Tristan et al
as 2:2011cv01166
Plaintiff:
George Hamilton
Defendant:
David Tristan, Edward Alameida, Thomas - Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Johnson v. David Runnels, et al
as 11-16058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, RODERICK HICKMAN, Youth and Adult Correctional Secretary, RICHARD RIMMER, Former Director of CDC and others
Bart Moore v. Anthony Collins, et al
as 11-20018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BART THOMAS MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY COLLINS, Warden, VONDA RAFTER, Former Captain, LT. RIVERS and others
Davis v. Franz et al
as 0:2010cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Glen Franz, Thomas Moore, Jr, Janine Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Winding v. E. Sparkman, et al
as 10-60633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. WINDING
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. SPARKMAN, Deputy Commissioner, DALE CASKEY, Warden, BART GRIMES, Assistant Warden and others
Thomas Moore v. Franklin Tennis, et al
as 10-1828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKLIN TENNIS, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Jumah Moore Ali v. Sacramento County, et al
as 09-17531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUMAH ABDULLAHI THOMA MOORE ALI, AKA Jumah Thomas Jumah T Moore Abdullahi Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY, LOU BLANAS, Sheriff, - TWOMEY, Lieutenant and others
Estrada v. Barnes et al
as 2:2009cv00021
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Estrada
Defendant:
James Barnes, Glendale Johnson, Jarod Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jumah Abdullahi Moore Ali v. C. Matthews, et al
as 09-15910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE MOORE, AKA Jumah Thomas Moore Abdullahi Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
C. MATTHEWS, SVSP Nurse, M. ARROYO, SVSP Nurse and C. VOGEL-PACE, SVSP Nurse
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
