Cases 71 - 80 of 4,718
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Rainey v. Bradley
as 0:2024cv01429
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allan Rainey
Defendant:
Agent Anne Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horn, Jimmie v. Hamilton, Todd et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Horne
Defendant:
Todd Hamilton, Marylne Larson, Bradley Boivin and others
Not Yet Classified:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. USA
as 3:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
Bradley J Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bradley v. Cazzell
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jason Bruce Bradley
Defendant:
Jim Cazzell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cookie Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amanda Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth Peralta v. District Attorney Lancaster County, et al
as 24-1535
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PERALTA
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, BRADLEY BOOHER and others
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Varner v. Booher et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Varner
Defendant:
Superintendent Bradley Booher, FCPD/Head Chaplain Henry Hansard and Rev. Ulli Klemm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Booher et al
as 1:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Dale R. Arnold
Defendant:
Bradley Booher, Henry Hansard, Ulli Klemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
