Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 164
Smith-Bey v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv01915
Petitioner: Charles Arnell Smith-Bey
Respondent: John Wolfe and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith-Bey v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv01654
Petitioner: Charles Arnell Smith-Bey
Respondent: John Wolfe and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith-Bey v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv01336
Petitioner: Charles A. Smith-Bey
Respondent: John Wolfe, Amy J. Bragunier and Rex W. Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2015cv01067
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith-Bey v. Warden John Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv00764
Petitioner: Charles Arnell Smith-Bey
Respondent: Warden John Wolfe and The Attorney General of State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. USA
as 3:2015cv00070
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Charles Edward Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Chaprias et al
as 6:2014cv06689
Plaintiff: Charles J. Smith
Defendant: Paul Chappius, M. Porter, Jame Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Chaprias et al
as 1:2014cv09599
Plaintiff: Charles J. Smith
Defendant: Paul Chaprias, M. Porter, James Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01728
Petitioner: Charles E. Smith
Respondent: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Cumberland County Probation & Parole, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00455
Plaintiff: James Edward Smith
Defendant: Charles A Smith, Mary Ann Conley and Robert Castillow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?